Bug#694077: Package review
please release it (dch -r), push it and I'll upload.
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 09:07, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
<perezmeyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> El mar., 20 ago. 2019 05:35, Jérôme Lebleu <jerome@maroufle.fr> escribió:
>>
>> Hi Lisandro,
>>
>> I am happy to read from you!
>>
>> Le 19/08/2019 à 21:42, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit :
>> > I'm afraid it's failing to build from source:
>> >
>> > x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5 -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtMultimedia -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtGui -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtNetwork -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtScript -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore -I. -isystem /usr/include/libdrm -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/mkspecs/linux-g++ -o qlcfixturedefcache.o qlcfixturedefcache.cpp
>> > qlcfixturedef.cpp: In member function ‘QLCPhysical QLCFixtureDef::physical() const’:
>> > qlcfixturedef.cpp:342:12: error: implicitly-declared ‘QLCPhysical::QLCPhysical(const QLCPhysical&)’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-copy]
>> > 342 | return m_physical;
>> > | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> > In file included from qlcfixturedef.h:28,
>> > from qlcfixturemode.h:29,
>> > from qlcfixturedef.cpp:28:
>> > qlcphysical.h:78:18: note: because ‘QLCPhysical’ has user-provided ‘QLCPhysical& QLCPhysical::operator=(const QLCPhysical&)’
>> > 78 | QLCPhysical& operator=(const QLCPhysical& physical);
>> > | ^~~~~~~~
>> > cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
>> > make[3]: *** [Makefile:1206: qlcfixturedef.o] Error 1
>> > make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> > make[3]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/engine/src'
>> > make[2]: *** [Makefile:90: sub-src-make_first-ordered] Error 2
>> > make[2]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/engine'
>> > make[1]: *** [Makefile:96: sub-engine-make_first-ordered] Error 2
>> > make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
>> > dh_auto_build: make -j2 returned exit code 2
>> > make: *** [debian/rules:14: build] Error 255
>> > dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit status 2
>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Build finished at 2019-08-19T19:38:24Z
>> >
>> >
>> > Could it be the switch to gcc-9?
>>
>> Thanks for your report, I have just discovered that yesterday too. Yes
>> it should be the switch to gcc-9 as there were no errors before... I
>> have added -Wno-error=deprecated-copy for the moment to makes this
>> warnings not be errors. I will take the time as soon as possible to
>> report it upstream, if it is not meanwhile fixed. Is it also okay for a
>> first upload too?
>
>
> I think it is.
--
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Reply to: