[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#694077: Package review



I'm afraid it's failing to build from source:

x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5 -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtMultimedia -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtGui -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtNetwork -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtScript -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore -I. -isystem /usr/include/libdrm -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/mkspecs/linux-g++ -o qlcfixturedefcache.o qlcfixturedefcache.cpp 
qlcfixturedef.cpp: In member function ‘QLCPhysical QLCFixtureDef::physical() const’:
qlcfixturedef.cpp:342:12: error: implicitly-declared ‘QLCPhysical::QLCPhysical(const QLCPhysical&)’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-copy]                                                                  
  342 |     return m_physical;
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~
In file included from qlcfixturedef.h:28,
                 from qlcfixturemode.h:29,
                 from qlcfixturedef.cpp:28:
qlcphysical.h:78:18: note: because ‘QLCPhysical’ has user-provided ‘QLCPhysical& QLCPhysical::operator=(const QLCPhysical&)’                                                                                 
   78 |     QLCPhysical& operator=(const QLCPhysical& physical);
      |                  ^~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
make[3]: *** [Makefile:1206: qlcfixturedef.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[3]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/engine/src'
make[2]: *** [Makefile:90: sub-src-make_first-ordered] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/engine'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:96: sub-engine-make_first-ordered] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
dh_auto_build: make -j2 returned exit code 2
make: *** [debian/rules:14: build] Error 255
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit status 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Build finished at 2019-08-19T19:38:24Z


Could it be the switch to gcc-9? 


Reply to: