Bug#910575: Bug#910591: ITA: logdata-anomaly-miner -- lightweight tool for log checking, log analysis
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
X-Debbugs-CC: roman.fiedler@ait.ac.at
Hi Markus,
Wurzenberger Markus <Markus.Wurzenberger@ait.ac.at> 于2018年10月11日周四 上午7:20写道：
>
> Hi Boyuan,
>
> unfortunately, Roman left our organization. Therefore, there is no possibility
> for him to make any confirmations via e-mail. Before he left, he handed me
> over the logdata- anomaly-miner launchpad project and repository to maintain
> and further develop it, as you can see here:
> https://launchpad.net/logdata-anomaly-miner
> https://git.launchpad.net/logdata-anomaly-miner
He should have informed the downstream distributions before leaving to
fully hand over the
responsibilities... but it seems a little bit late to make such reminder.
> Please let me know how to handle this situation so that I can keep the
> logdata-anomaly-miner Debian package up to date.
I am sending a mail copy to Debian QA/MIA Team since it looks like a
missing-in-action
scenario. Meanwhile, all latter uploads should not remove Roman from
maintainer list
unless he sends out a public email declaring the handover of
maintenance, or the Debian MIA
Team decides that his package should be orphaned.
I don't have enough time recently to review the work; I may examine it
later or some
other Debian Developers would review it.
--
Thanks,
Boyuan Yang
> Regards,
> Markus Wurzenberger
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
> Sent: Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2018 22:10
> To: 910575@bugs.debian.org; 910591@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Bug#910591: ITA: logdata-anomaly-miner -- lightweight tool for log
> checking, log analysis
>
> X-Debbugs-CC: roman.fiedler@ait.ac.at markus.wurzenberger@ait.ac.at
> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> I noticed your RFS and ITA document. However, it seems that the original
> maintainer (Roman Fiedler) never submitted the RFA or Orphaning bug to declare
> that this package is given up for adoption. I think an acknowledgment from the
> original maintainer should be necessary.
>
> Dear Roman, could you please send an public email to confirm that you are
> willing to have Markus taken over the package maintenance?
>
> If Markus is no longer able to send emails to make confirmation, that is
> another situation and needs to be handled differently.
Reply to: