[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#641597: marked as done (RFP: haml -- Haml is a markup language that is used to cleanly and simply describe the HTML of any web document without the use of inline code.)

Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:20:25 +0000
with message-id <E1fcvNJ-0000Gy-5e@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: haml -- Haml is a markup language that is used to cleanly and simply describe the HTML of any web document without the use of inline code.
has caused the Debian Bug report #641597,
regarding RFP: haml -- Haml is a markup language that is used to cleanly and simply describe the HTML of any web document without the use of inline code.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
641597: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641597
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marcin Antczak <marcin.antczak@neutrico.pl>


  Package name    : haml
  Version         : 3.1.3
  Upstream Author : Hampton Catlin <contact@hamptoncatlin.com>
  URL             : http://haml-lang.com/
  License         : MIT
  Programming Lang: haml
  Description     : Haml is a markup language that is used to cleanly and simply describe the HTML of any web document without the use of inline code.

Haml and Sass have, finally, become independent projects. This is why I would like to package this project in new version and replace current libhaml-ruby package.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 641597 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: