[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#586472: marked as done (RFP: checksec -- script that tests which standard security features are being used)



Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:20:15 +0000
with message-id <E1fcvN9-0008K5-4X@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: checksec -- script that tests which standard security features are being used
has caused the Debian Bug report #586472,
regarding RFP: checksec -- script that tests which standard security features are being used
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
586472: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586472
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Owner: Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com>
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : checksec
  Version         : 1.3.1
  Upstream Author : Tobias Klein <tk@trapkit.de>
* URL             : http://www.trapkit.de/tools/checksec.html
* License         : BSD
  Programming Lang: Bash
  Description     : A script that tests which standard security features are being used

Modern Linux distributions offer some mitigation techniques to make it
harder to exploit software vulnerabilities reliably. Mitigations such
as RELRO, NoExecute (NX), Stack Canaries, Address Space Layout
Randomization (ASLR) and Position Independent Executables (PIE) have
made reliably exploiting any vulnerabilities that do exist far more
challenging. The checksec script is designed to test which standard
security features are being used.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
RFP 586472 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: