[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#705937: marked as done (RFP: rgm3800 -- Access Royaltek RGM-3800 and compatible GPS datalogger)

Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2018 16:20:16 +0000
with message-id <E1fQEgy-0006hh-7k@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: rgm3800 -- Access Royaltek RGM-3800 and compatible GPS datalogger
has caused the Debian Bug report #705937,
regarding RFP: rgm3800 -- Access Royaltek RGM-3800 and compatible GPS datalogger
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
705937: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705937
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

* Package name    : rgm3800
  Version         : Rev. 25
  Upstream Author : Karsten Petersen petersen.karsten@gmail.com 
* URL             : http://code.google.com/p/rgm3800py/
* License         : GPL v3 
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : Access Royaltek RGM-3800 and compatible GPS datalogger


With this command line utility you can:

- - Dump tracks off your RGM-3800 GPS datalogger in NMEA and GPX format.
- - List tracks with information.
- - Configure logging format and interval.
- - Check memory usage.
- - Erase all tracks.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlF1P9gACgkQqVj5VlP9Od2gqwCeJFblYIYCgRE6NP2vyUZThnyd
09AAn3mjuwE5lIxf9fMqYdh760d1dOzb
=y+uC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 705937 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: