* Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au> [2018-04-18 18:02:22 +1000]: > Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > > * Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> [2018-03-30 17:14:49 +0200]: > > > beancount 2.0 was released a few days ago so it's time to get this > > > into Debian. > > > Anyone interested in packaging it? It's Python code. > > I've been meaning to look into this for a while, as I've been using > > beancount in an org I'm treasurer of. > > I'll put this in the python-team/applications group on > > salsa. Comaintainers welcome! > > Any luck here? I didn't see anything on salsa yet, but maybe I missed it. > Don't suppose you've looked at packaging fava as well? Hi! I've finally gotten around to finalizing the beancount packaging. I've run across a few test failures on the released 2.0.0, but I noticed that they have been fixed by tbm and Martin Blais in upstream PRs; I've followed the easy route and updated the packaging to a snapshot of the upstream mercurial repo: some of the test failures were fixed after a refactoring of the external price source handling, so the patch doesn't apply cleanly to 2.0.0... Yay. The packaging is on https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications/beancount and uses a standard gbp buildpackage (with pristine-tar) workflow. The only thing that's not working currently is the dependency split between default dependencies and optional dependencies for extra features. It's not exactly critical but it'd be nice to have. I'd also be happy with better wording for the long description of the packages. Once that's done and if you're happy I think the package should be ready for upload. Cheers, -- Nicolas Dandrimont BOFH excuse #223: The lines are all busy (busied out, that is -- why let them in to begin with?).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature