[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#692348: marked as done (RFP: libistack-commons-java -- Common code for some Glassfish projects)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:20:04 +0000
with message-id <E1eRF0G-0001kr-An@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: libistack-commons-java -- Common code for some Glassfish projects
has caused the Debian Bug report #692348,
regarding RFP: libistack-commons-java -- Common code for some Glassfish projects
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
692348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692348
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : libistack-commons-java
  Version         : 2.6.1 
  Upstream Author : Project Glassfish
* URL             : http://istack-commons.java.net/ 
* License         : CDDL v1.1 or GPL v2
  Programming Lang: Java
  Description     : Common code for some Glassfish projects

JAXP, JAXB, SAAJ, and JAX-WS projects are often used together by other projects (such as Mustang, Glassfish. But at the same time, they are released independently, and those technolgoies don't necessarily have dependencies between them.

To promote code reuse between these projects, we host the common part in a separate project, so that when we ship individually, we can each carry istack-commons.jar, and when e deliver together into another technology, we can reduce the footprint. 

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/istack-commons

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
RFP 692348 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: