[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#686222: marked as done (RFP: ted -- lightweight .DOC editor)



Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2017 22:19:57 +0000
with message-id <E1e38JB-0001OS-Qg@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: ted -- lightweight .DOC editor
has caused the Debian Bug report #686222,
regarding RFP: ted -- lightweight .DOC editor
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
686222: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686222
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: ITP: ted -- lightweight .DOC editor
Package: wnpp
Version: 2.22; reported 2012-01-04
Severity: wishlist

* Package name : ted
Version : 2.22
Upstream Author : Mark de Does <mark@mdedoes.xs4all.nl>
* URL : http://nllgg.nl/Ted/
* License : GPL
Description : lightweight .DOC editor

This was included in previous versions of Debian, but removed, *I believe*, for the reason that it was thought to be unmaintained... The current version has now switched to using GTK+ and was released five months ago. ( previous version is over seven years )

The only "valid" .DOC editors in Debian are LibreOffice and AbiWord, which are both somewhat bloated (especially LibreOffice, as it's in Java) ... I believe Ted is a nice lightweight alternative.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
RFP 686222 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: