Bug#665652: marked as done (RFP: nagios-nrdp -- Nagios Remote Data Processor)
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2017 04:20:04 +0000
with message-id <E1d7a9U-00040A-Kv@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFP: nagios-nrdp -- Nagios Remote Data Processor
has caused the Debian Bug report #665652,
regarding RFP: nagios-nrdp -- Nagios Remote Data Processor
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
665652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665652
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: RFP: nagios-nrdp -- Nagios Remote Data Processor
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 00:30:28 +0100
- Message-id: <20120324233028.11350.1572.reportbug@heisenberg.scientia.net>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : nagios-nrdp
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Ethan Galstad <egalstad@nagios.org>
* URL : http://exchange.nagios.org/directory/Addons/Passive-Checks/NRDP--2D-Nagios-Remote-Data-Processor/details
* License : BSD, Nagios Open Software License
Programming Lang: PHP
Description : Nagios Remote Data Processor
Nagios Remote Data Processor (NDRP) is a flexible data transport mechanism and processor
for Nagios. It is designed with a simple and powerful architecture that allows for it
to be easily extended and customized to fit individual users' needs. It uses standard
ports protocols (HTTP(S) and XML) and can be implemented as a replacement for NSCA.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
RFP 665652 has no visible progress for a long time, so closing.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: