Bug#798278: node-tape ITPs with different owners
Control: owner -1 Lucas Castro <lucas@gnuabordo.com.br>
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 04:56:55PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote:
> I'm so sorry doing that,
>
> I've not noticed that already had a ITP for that one,
>
> I'm working on another node-* packages too.
> I'll be more careful.
When you package node-tape everyone will be happy. :-)
> Lucas Castro
cu
Adrian
> On 29-10-2016 08:38, Ross Gammon wrote:
> > Hi Adrian & Lucas,
> >
> > I have been working on and off packaging the dependencies for
> > node-tape and browserify and kosmtik for a while now.
> >
> > From my point of view, there are so many Node modules that need
> > packaging that I don't mind someone else helping out. So whoever gets
> > there first (for node-tape or its dependencies) is welcome to take
> > ownership of the ITP or RFP if I was the original owner. I will see
> > the bug change ownership, and if I had something half finished I will
> > let you know and push what I had somewhere for you. If I don't notice,
> > it shouldn't matter, because with npm2deb there isn't much time wasted.
> >
> > Thanks for noticing the duplication Adrian!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ross
> >
> >
> > On 28/10/16 23:18, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >> Control: forcemerge -1 842327
> >>
> >> Hi Ross, hi Lucas,
> >>
> >> you both submitted ITPs for node-tape.
> >>
> >> Please coordinate and agree who will package node-tape.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Adrian
> >>
> >
Reply to: