I'm so sorry doing that, I've not noticed that already had a ITP for that one, I'm working on another node-* packages too. I'll be more careful. -- Lucas Castro On 29-10-2016 08:38, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi Adrian & Lucas, > > I have been working on and off packaging the dependencies for > node-tape and browserify and kosmtik for a while now. > > From my point of view, there are so many Node modules that need > packaging that I don't mind someone else helping out. So whoever gets > there first (for node-tape or its dependencies) is welcome to take > ownership of the ITP or RFP if I was the original owner. I will see > the bug change ownership, and if I had something half finished I will > let you know and push what I had somewhere for you. If I don't notice, > it shouldn't matter, because with npm2deb there isn't much time wasted. > > Thanks for noticing the duplication Adrian! > > Regards, > > Ross > > > On 28/10/16 23:18, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> Control: forcemerge -1 842327 >> >> Hi Ross, hi Lucas, >> >> you both submitted ITPs for node-tape. >> >> Please coordinate and agree who will package node-tape. >> >> Thanks >> Adrian >> >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature