[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#721649: marked as done (O: libpcapnav -- wrapper to libpcap)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2016 20:13:59 +0000
with message-id <E1brW6B-0007IU-Q2@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#839698: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #721649,
regarding O: libpcapnav -- wrapper to libpcap
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

721649: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721649
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

libpcapnav is a libpcap wrapper library that allows navigation to arbitrary
locations in a tcpdump trace file between reads.

This library was developed into Netdude project and was packaged in Debian to
support Netdude. However, the Netdude was abandoned and can't be packaged
because is over GLib1. So, I am leaving this package.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.8-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package libpcapnav has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/839698

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing

Debian distribution maintenance software
Chris Lamb (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply to: