[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#680426: marked as done (RFP: libprocess -- An actor-style concurrency library for C++)

Your message dated Sun, 2 Oct 2016 11:08:39 +0200
with message-id <f44dc9fe-7c88-b5ec-0867-60c3f0a70844@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680426: ITP: libprocess -- An actor-style concurrency library for C++.
has caused the Debian Bug report #680426,
regarding RFP: libprocess -- An actor-style concurrency library for C++
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
680426: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680426
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Brandon Mitchell <brandon@twitter.com>

* Package name    : libprocess
  Version         : 0.0.1
  Upstream Author : Name <benh@berkeley.edu>
* URL             : http://github.com/libprocess/libprocess
* License         : Apache 2.0
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description     : An actor-style concurrency library for C++.

libprocess provides actor-style concurrency for constructing distributed systems in
C++. It was developed as part of the Mesos project at the University of California,
Berkeley.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:54:37 +1000 Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 wontfix
> 
> Libprocess is de-facto maintained somewhere in Mesos since the latter ships 
> newer bundled libprocess sources while libprocess' own repository [1] is not 
> updated since May 2013.
> 
> It may be possible to generate shared libprocess from Mesos tarball but Mesos 
> statically link libprocess.
> 
> In its current state libprocess is not ready to be packaged as shared library 
> hence I'm tagging this bug as "wontfix".
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/3rdparty/libprocess
> 
> -- 
> Best wishes,
>  Dmitry Smirnov.

I agree with Dmitry, libprocess isn't going/doesn't need to be packaged as a separate
source package. Therefore, I'm closing this bug now.

Cheers,
DS

-- 
4096R/DF5182C8
http://www.danielstender.com/blog/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: