On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 13:57:33 +0200 Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Santiago Ruano Rincón <santiagorr@riseup.net > > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:34:11 +0100 Luca Boccassi > > <luca.boccassi@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 08:38:58 +0200 Christian Ehrhardt > > > <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 7:41 AM, C.J. Collier > > > > <cjcollier@linuxfoundation.org > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:51:20 +0100 Christian Ehrhardt > > > > > <paelzer@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > I'm also no DD, so sponsors will be needed. > > > > > > > > > > I'm interested in co-maintaining this package, and I've been a > > > > > Debian user > > > > > for a couple of decades now. I've even been an uploader, years > > > > > ago. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi C.J., > > > > great to hear that you want to help as well - I'm sure it will get > > > > great. > > > > We are Currently three people: > > > > - Luca Boccassi - DM, already applied for package upload permissions > > > > - Martin Thiago - Experienced in experimenting with > > > > DPDK/Debian/Ubuntu, > > > > giving us a broad testing&usage range > > > > - Myself - Packaging DPDK for Ubuntu, Testing DPDK with integrated > > > > tests > > > > and Openvswitch-DPDK > > > > > > > > You would be a great addition to our group - more Debian experience > > > > will > > > > surely help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've submitted an ITP for the FD.io group of packages: > > > > > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819516 > > > > > > > > > > These depend on DPDK, so I've got an interest in making sure the > > > > > DPDK > > > > > packages are good. > > > > > > > > > > > > > From what I learned with packaging DPDK 2.2 for Ubuntu 16.04 there > > > > are a > > > > lot of things that can fail with DPDK. > > > > It is a great, but also fast moving and bleeding edge project. > > > > So testing and patching is needed - more packages "Consuming" the > > > > library > > > > and thereby more diverse test exposure help exactly with that. > > > > > > > > The three of us kind of agreed on the following rough schedule: > > > > - (Now / Luca) Requesting upload permissions for DPDK > > > > - (Now / Me) Completing testing and fixing DPDK packaging in ubuntu > > > > - (11th of May / All of us) start a kick off for packaging DPDK in > > > > Debian > > > > > > > > It would be great to have DPDK on Debian. I can upload the packages, and > > maybe co-maintain. > > > Hi Santiago, > so far Luca was planned to maintain it, but I'd assume he is no objecting > to a co-maintainer. > Especially if the co-maintainer can help with the initial upload. > It might be good to know about a lot of details in advance out of the scope > of actually uploading it. > We would be happy if you join us in our work even before the initial upload > takes place. No objections at all, more help is always welcome :-) -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part