[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#828028: Reasons for packaging my own fork of sct versus the real upstream



It was suggested in the RFS (#829151) that I should clarify why I am
packaging my fork of this instead of the original.

The original was released in a blog post as a sort of code dump
(http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/sct-set-color-temperature )
I thought it would improve long term maintainability if there was a real
build system and active upstream. It's pretty hard to package software
without a tarball or VCS. If this is discouraged, I'd be happy to email
the real upstream about it, but I simply thought this would be easier
for everyone.

Jacob Adams
GPG Key: AF6B 1C26 E2D0 A988 432B  94F4 24C0 2B85 B59F E5A9

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: