[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#813204: marked as done (ITA: debtags -- Enables support for package tags)

Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2016 16:39:43 +0000
with message-id <E1bKTNv-0006J7-Ja@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#813204: fixed in debtags 2.1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #813204,
regarding ITA: debtags -- Enables support for package tags
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
813204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I intend to orphan the debtags package.

The package description is:
 debtags provides a system to download a database of package tags and keep
 it up to date.  A package tag is a small label that gets attached to a
 Debian package to represent one of its qualities.
 .
 A package tag database in the system can enable advanced package search
 techniques, and advanced package browsing functions in programs that
 support it.
 .
 This package has been made as a way to deploy and test package tags
 support until it gets integrated in the normal Debian workflow.

Rationale is at https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/01/msg00729.html

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: debtags
Source-Version: 2.1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debtags, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 813204@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Enrico Rossi <e.rossi@tecnobrain.com> (supplier of updated debtags package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:33:30 +0200
Source: debtags
Binary: debtags
Architecture: source
Version: 2.1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Enrico Rossi <e.rossi@tecnobrain.com>
Changed-By: Enrico Rossi <e.rossi@tecnobrain.com>
Description:
 debtags    - Debian Package Tags support tools
Closes: 799584 813204 828776
Changes:
 debtags (2.1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer. (Closes: #813204)
   * Set standards-version to 3.9.8 no changes required.
   * Fix UnicodeDecodeError on non-utf8 data from apt cache.
     (Closes: #828776, #799584)
Checksums-Sha1:
 811255c0a10641e7499488a38456d29be153bd5b 1716 debtags_2.1.1.dsc
 dbafd9dbbe3aaed6666ca2ac3ba4c9d09e946f3f 556472 debtags_2.1.1.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 9b6bd291b203b7b1a9bfe7ece700a93f036e25bd5a58e9d0a9bb6f0e5bd956c4 1716 debtags_2.1.1.dsc
 11718669d0fa4ce4b25ad95ae6f2691c31bb6bb04c5d5e5c94f44285f11cf659 556472 debtags_2.1.1.tar.xz
Files:
 3fa526c5dbd5fb9b6a0c75be21f658f6 1716 admin optional debtags_2.1.1.dsc
 a4fd8fbc8c6e50edff573a9562b213ef 556472 admin optional debtags_2.1.1.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=SuUV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: