Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes for MkDocs
> please don't use python- prefix, use mkdocs-bootswatch. Note that binary
> package is "mkdocs"
Ok, so I just call both source *and* binary packages mkdocs-bootswatch
and mkdocs-bootstrap then?
>> I plan to maintain this as part of the DPMT - Debian Python Modules
>> Team.
>
> I think PAPT is more appropriate for mkdocs. I don't think it is also
> appropriate for themes, but since mkdocs-bootswatch/mkdocs-bootstrap are
> tightly related to another DPMT^W PAPT package, IMHO we can make an
> exception in PAPT for them (but I'd prefer to have them outside the
> team, TBH - DPMT/PAPT are not collab-maint replacements).
mkdocs was required for a DPMT package - django-rest-framework - and
this is the only reason I bother to package it. It is already in DPMT.
Recent mkdocs has split up, and now requires these packages too.
I tried to get access to PAPT (so I could fix another package), however
so far haven't got a response.
I would sooner maintain them in collab-maint rather then PAPT, because I
don't really want to have to convert my git repositories to
subversion. I believe subversion is still required by PAPT.
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Reply to: