[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager



Hi,

toogley wrote:
> does it bother, when i work at the package within a delay of a week at most?

If it doesn't bother that I work on the package, too.

At least I want to fix the things I broke with the initial 1.7.3
upload. :-)

> @Axel:
> 
> May i import + upload the next version of wicd (which is 1.7.5, i think)?

Fine for me. I do expect another upstream release anyway, since I told
upstream which of the Debian patches he could import. :-)

Maybe you should subscribe to the two wicd upstream mailing lists (if
you haven't already):

http://sourceforge.net/p/wicd/mailman/?source=navbar

> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/wicd.html
> says, the package building has failed,

Oh! Didn't notice so far.

Ah, it only failed in one of two builds, in the one with a non-English
locale. So there may be locale-dependent things in the build system.

> because of "dpkg-source: warning: failed to verify signature on ./wicd_1.7.3-3.dsc"

I don't see that line in the log at
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/logs/unstable/amd64/wicd_1.7.3-3.build2.log.gz
(which is the log of the failed build)

That line is from
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/rbuild/unstable/amd64/wicd_1.7.3-3.rbuild.log
which didn't fail.

So that's not the reason. This issue is the reason for failed build:

[...]
   dh_install
dh_install: wicd-daemon missing files: usr/share/locale/
dh_install: missing files, aborting
debian/rules:8 : la recette pour la cible « binary » a échouée
make: *** [binary] Erreur 255
dpkg-buildpackage: erreur: fakeroot debian/rules binary a produit une erreur de sortie de type 2

		Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE


Reply to: