[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#809464: marked as done (ITP: ruby-jeweler -- Opinionated tool for creating and managing RubyGem projects)

Your message dated Fri, 01 Jan 2016 17:00:16 +0000
with message-id <E1aF33o-00064H-N2@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#809464: fixed in ruby-jeweler 2.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #809464,
regarding ITP: ruby-jeweler -- Opinionated tool for creating and managing RubyGem projects
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
809464: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Andrew Lee (李健秋)" <ajqlee@debian.org>

* Package name    : ruby-jeweler
  Version         : 2.0.1-1
  Upstream Author : Josh Nichols <josh@technicalpickles.com>
* URL             : http://github.com/technicalpickles/jeweler
* License         : MIT
  Programming Lang: Ruby
  Description     : Opinionated tool for creating and managing RubyGem projects

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: ruby-jeweler
Source-Version: 2.0.1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby-jeweler, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 809464@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrew Lee (李健秋) <andrew.lee@collabora.co.uk> (supplier of updated ruby-jeweler package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 04:28:02 +0800
Source: ruby-jeweler
Binary: ruby-jeweler
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andrew Lee (李健秋) <andrew.lee@collabora.co.uk>
Description:
 ruby-jeweler - Opinionated tool for creating and managing RubyGem projects
Closes: 809464
Changes:
 ruby-jeweler (2.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #809464)
Checksums-Sha1:
 83fb81cd8efd31a8cd87ba0b448af90dbe8e38ff 2046 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-1.dsc
 3aed553dd9b22124a0d3dac7c8277256e7d8d6a8 56567 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 18d5a1ee6e78e1e38657f2423beeec4842170467 2244 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 925330dfed9a802a985f4cf6e08d26c359aebd39 27314 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 5e73e64fb7662f1fc5e3e562edcb10c9a8ab05037a1f8e40d8f7049d5eda075e 2046 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-1.dsc
 53a25db6ba4b9645c0cd7a6cc27e4c9d1d5a45edfb230f0f31e39f383d4e5949 56567 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 4f14424041699521fef793a47495d7754e857d8dd2b64677ae823a0217f14349 2244 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 3a68a5c37e3016b8b6a4f19277d94582cf96549c961171f011cc063c8e45b1c2 27314 ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-1_all.deb
Files:
 53f1b8c92ab20c6130684100215bc896 2046 ruby optional ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-1.dsc
 48c22208e0676cccfb9e1b9bacb9712b 56567 ruby optional ruby-jeweler_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 71133ce41299d708f9ecd4ec8077c473 2244 ruby optional ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 beb66e272e0e5240e451887e479cd20e 27314 ruby optional ruby-jeweler_2.0.1-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=mKC3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: