Bug#801307: ITP: pybtex-docutils -- A docutils backend for pybtex
I think you should consider packaging it under DPMT as it has
potential (and even real) applications in other packages. of course
seqan belongs to deb-med, I do think that a general py module should
belong to a general py module team.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Kevin Murray <kevin@kdmurray.id.au> wrote:
> Hi Sandro,
>
> On 12:47 08/10, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> [...]
>> >
>> > This package will be co-maintained with the Debian Med team.
>>
>> why in Deb Med team and not a more general python team like DPMT? It
>> doesnt look like it has anything specific to "med"
>>
>
> My rationale is that no-one in such teams has packaged it yet, and I am only
> packaging it as a build-depend of SeqAn, which is very much a Debian Med
> package.
>
> Though I understand if the team would rather this be maintained elsewhere.
>
> Cheers,
> K
>
>
> ---
> Kevin Murray
>
> GPG pubkey: http://www.kdmurray.id.au/static/A4B4EE6A.asc
> FPR: 656C 0632 1EAB 2C3F 3837 9767 17C2 8EB1 A4B4 EE6A
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Reply to: