Bug#780060: [RFS] SleepyHead (ITP: #780060)
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:33:21PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> > Please note that there is no point in creating a new changelog entry if
> > there was no package uploaded. I dropped the new entry - please pull.
>
> Yeah, I was not sure whether or not it made sense to do that. On the
> one hand, if I had not done that, we would have a tag pointing to a
> Debian release (debian/0.9.8-1) and then we would have commits after
> this tag. On the other hand, we would have a second Debian release
> without having released the first.
Only packages that really made it to unstable should be tagged. So
please remove the tag until the package is accepted.
> I think the solution would be to retag the latest commit as
> debian/0.9.8-1, maybe?
Yes. But as I said *after* ftpmaster has accepted the package.
> > I: sleepyhead source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
>
> This is because upstream is still not releasing versioned source
> tarballs. I've made a request to the author, and he told me he is going
> to start doing that in the next releases.
OK. What we are doing in this case is documenting this like
debian/watch:
# upstream is still not releasing versioned source
# tarballs. I've made a request to the author, and he told me he is going
# to start doing that in the next releases.
> > I: sleepyhead: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/SleepyHead calender calendar
> > I: sleepyhead: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/SleepyHead Libaries Libraries
> > I: sleepyhead: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/SleepyHead consistancy consistency
> > I: sleepyhead: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/SleepyHead succesfully successfully
> > I: sleepyhead: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/SleepyHead independant independent
> > I: sleepyhead: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/SleepyHead seperately separately
> > I: sleepyhead: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/SleepyHead softwares software
> > I: sleepyhead: spelling-error-in-binary usr/bin/SleepyHead GNU Public License GNU General Public License
>
> These are all spelling errors. I can obviously patch the package
> locally and send a patch upstream, but I don't think it's worth delaying
> the release because of this (IMHO).
Ahh, you are right. I somehow assumed you are part of the upstream
team. I'd recommend to simply forward these issues.
> > I: sleepyhead: description-synopsis-might-not-be-phrased-properly
>
> I can fix this.
>
> > I: sleepyhead: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration
>
> The package has really no documentation (unfortunately). The three
> files that are listed in debian/docs are very simple (rudimentary, I'd
> say) texts; that's why I did not register a doc-base. If you think it
> is worth, I can silence this info.
May be it makes sense to provide a lintian-override. I do not want
to be over-picky. Just mentioning the options to a newbie.
> > Since you confirmed to be upstream (or closely connected to upstream) if
> > I remember correctly, you might even be easily able to fix the spelling
> > issues.
>
> I'm not upstream, I'm just becoming more involved with it. I will send
> patches fixing the spelling errors, and I'll patch the package locally
> as well.
Fine. Just ping me once you think you are finished with theses things.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: