[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#780060: [RFS] SleepyHead (ITP: #780060)



On Sunday, October 11 2015, Andreas Tille wrote:

> Hi Sergio,

Hey Andreas,

> thanks for preparing sleepyhead packaging.

My pleasure.

> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 03:06:19AM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> As promised, here is the RFS for SleepyHead.  I have just pushed my
>> local repository to /debian-med/sleepyhead.git, and now I would
>> appreciate if you could take a look and let me know what you think.  IMO
>> it is ready to be uploaded.  I haven't uploaded the actual package
>> (.deb/.changes) anywhere, but I can do that if needed.
>
> I think the two README files are not very well designed.  In
> README.source which is targeting at Debian developers something is said
> about sdcards which is most probably some advise for users.  Please move
> this information to README.Debian.  In turn the infromation about
> patches and quality of code should rather be in README.source.

Sigh, that's what you get when you do things tired.  I'm sorry about
that; as may be obvious, I switched the filenames when writing the
advices.  This is now fixed.

> So far for the minor issues.  The majir issue is that the package does
> not build in a pbuilder chroot:
>
> ...
>  debian/rules build
> dh build --buildsystem=qmake --builddirectory=_build/
>    dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=qmake -O--builddirectory=_build/
>    debian/rules override_dh_auto_configure
> make[1]: Entering directory '/build/sleepyhead-0.9.8'
> dh_auto_configure -- ..
> dh_auto_configure: error: unable to chdir to _build
> debian/rules:17: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_configure' failed
> make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2
> ...

This is because of #800738.  I fixed it locally but forgot to adjust
debian/rules to workaround this issue.  Should also be fixed.

Could you give it another try?

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/


Reply to: