Hello, On 04/09/15 08:51 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > I mean their BSD-like license is neither BSD-2-clause [1] nor BSD-3-clause > [2] hence it would be wrong to call it "BSD-2-clause" because the text of the > license is not canonical. I thought that this was the reason that we included a full copy of the license in debian/copyright. I have renamed the license to "BSD-2-clause/AMQP" and pushed the change to the repository. Thank you Dimitry! -- Alexandre Viau alexandre@alexandreviau.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature