On Friday 04 September 2015 20:24:04 Alexandre Viau wrote:
> On 04/09/15 07:36 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > Also I'm not sure about license name: text of the license is not classic
> > BSD-2-clause so perhaps it is better written as "BSD-2-clause/AMPQ" or
> > something like this...
>
> hmm, AMPQ? do you mean amqp? There is an amqp license and its different:
> https://www.amqp.org/legal/amqp-license
>
> I think its like BSD, and I have included the verbatim copy in
> debian/copyright.
I mean their BSD-like license is neither BSD-2-clause [1] nor BSD-3-clause
[2] hence it would be wrong to call it "BSD-2-clause" because the text of the
license is not canonical.
[1]: http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause
[2]: http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause
--
Cheers,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
There is nothing more odious than the majority. It consist of a few
powerful men who lead the way; of accommodating rascals and submissive
weaklings; and of a mass of men who trot after them without in the least
knowing their own minds.
-- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.