I failed to CC bugs.debian.org, so for the sake of completeness I'm quoting the missing mails back to the BTS: >>> On 15-08-31 10:52:29, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >>> >>> Last question: are you aware of any performance comparison between >>> exuberant-ctags and universal-ctags? >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:02:12AM +0200, Víctor Cuadrado Juan wrote: >> >> I'm not aware of any performance comparison, and my own experience is >> moot, as I have only used it on little C projects. >> But I would say we should expect at least the same performance as from >> exuberant-ctags, as it is a fork of it. >> >> Furthermore, there is no stable release yet (neither 6.0 continuing >> with exuberant-ctags nor 1.0), but it seems close. >> Maybe this package should go to experimental? > On 15-08-31 11:11:39, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Given it's not a replacement for exuberant-ctags, but only an option to > it in the Debian archive, I don't think so. But you might want to > contact the upstream author and ask for their opinion on this matter. > > Cheers. -- Víctor -- E-Mail: <me@viccuad.me>, OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xA2591E231E251F36 Key fingerprint: E3C5 114C 0C5B 4C49 BA03 0991 A259 1E23 1E25 1F36 My signed E-Mails are trustworthy.
Attachment:
pgpGQXwFCGCNM.pgp
Description: PGP signature