Bug#752264: Untested binary in experimental? the 21st century)
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 02:23:07PM +0200, Philipp Marek wrote:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752264 says
>
> Fix blocked by 783044:
> ITP: busted -- Lua unit testing framework focused on ease of use
>
> While I understand the value of being able to test a build, I'd like
> discuss the (IMO positive) value of having an untested binary package in
> experimental, as compared to having no package.
Agreed. Just trying to clear a few other things off my list before
getting to this.
Cheers,
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <jamessan@debian.org>
Reply to: