Bug#784184: marked as done (ipkungfu - iptables-based Linux firewall)
Your message dated Sun, 3 May 2015 17:46:29 -0500
with message-id <CAJY06gVFi9_9-pFNTdB3Bc23OOHODDo7CRi6kkwJiQ-ho4kaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#784184: Acknowledgement (ipkungfu - iptables-based Linux firewall)
has caused the Debian Bug report #784184,
regarding ipkungfu - iptables-based Linux firewall
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
784184: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784184
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Since my time for working on Debian is near zero, the best option is
to find a new owner for those packages.
--
Luis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Replaced by #784186
thanks
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System
<owner@bugs.debian.org> wrote:
> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
>
> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
> has been received.
>
> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
> interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
>
> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
> wnpp@debian.org
>
> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
> send it to 784184@bugs.debian.org.
>
> Please do not send mail to owner@bugs.debian.org unless you wish
> to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
>
> --
> 784184: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784184
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
Luis
--- End Message ---
Reply to: