On 01/16/2015 06:34 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> [...]
> On 16.01.2015 14:48, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
>>> I'd also object on the technical grounds that we already have xbill and
>>> the changes in xlennart don't truly justify a fork.
>>
>> This could be easily solved by merging xbill with xlennart to "xperson"
>> with collection of this people (bill and lennart).
>
> I absolutely agree with Ben here. I don't see anything special that
> would justify a fork.
>
> However, perhaps you might want to ask the
> upstream author of XBill to incorporate your changes and thus create a
> more customizable game. xbill.org is still online.
I see. By the way, it's _not my_ changes. I'm just a Debian user that
tries to get more experience of Debian packaging. I found the project
("xlennart") and just wanted to make a package and find a sponsor. I
didn't expected that this will be a sore subject. I'll just switch my
attention to other projects.
Best regards, Dmitry.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature