Hello. On 01/16/2015 08:53 AM, Riley Baird wrote: >> * URL : https://github.com/xaionaro/xlennart > > The URL should be the main branch of xlennart; that is > https://github.com/Xylemon/xlennart Yes, sorry. That was a mis-copy. I already commented the real URL in this issue (bug#775436). >>> if there are other packages providing similar functionality, how does it >>> compare? >> >> This's a fork of XBill. Everything the same, just with Lennart and SystenD >> instead of Bill and Wingdows. > > That sounds like a lot of code duplication. Is it possible to have a > common library between XBill and XLennart? I sent this question via ITS (on GitHub) of this project. > (Also, in any case, don't you think that this game is going a little too > far? I think it is not going farther than XBill. Permitting of XBill and forbidding of XLennart making double standards. Forbid both or permit both. Moreover I don't see any offense or problem if somebody will create game XDmitryYuOkunev (Dmitry Yu Okunev is my name). And what does Debian constitution says? It forbids such packages? > It's fine to be opposed to systemd, but don't do to Lennart > Poettering what the gamergate people did to Anita Sarkeesian.) I don't like mix politics and FOSS. FOSS is freedom. IMHO, nobody should forbid anybody to distribute any free package due to politics or something like this. Sorry if Debian thinks another way. Right now personally my interest is to learn how to Debianize projects (create and maintain Debian packages). So I won't protect this project. There's a great lot of another software for such practice :) Best regards, Dmitry.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature