[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#774744: ITP: obs -- Open Broadcast Software



On 9 January 2015 at 16:02, Carl Fürstenberg <azatoth@gmail.com> wrote:
> The frontend is called "obs-studio", though it contains a library called
> libobs0, thus I felt calling the source package obs-studio a bit wrong.
> At the moment, the binary packages would be obs-studio, obs-plugins,
> libobs0, libobs-dev, and libobs0-dbg.
>

These look like good binary package names. obs-studio sounds like a
good source package name as well (it's mostly non-user visible
anyway).

Thanks!


> But true, the source package though could be renamed to obsproject or
> similar; I'll have to talk to upstream first what they recommend.
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@debian.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 7 January 2015 at 01:57, Carl Fürstenberg <azatoth@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Package: wnpp
>> > Severity: wishlist
>> > Owner: "Carl Fürstenberg" <azatoth@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > * Package name    : obs
>> >   Version         : 0.7.2
>> >   Upstream Author : Hugh Bailey <obs.jim@gmail.com>
>> > * URL             : https://obsproject.com/
>> > * License         : GPL
>> >   Programming Lang: C, C++
>> >   Description     : Open Broadcast Software
>> >
>> > a rewrite of what was formerly known as "Open Broadcaster Software",
>> > software originally designed for recording and streaming live
>> > video content, efficiently.
>> >
>>
>> obs also means "open build service" and we have "obs-build" already
>> packaged. ( a component of it)
>>
>> Would you mind using a more verbose name for source & binary packages?
>> e.g. obsproject or open-broadcast?
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dimitri.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Carl Fürstenberg



-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.


Reply to: