[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#660685: marked as done (RFH: gnupg -- GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement)

Your message dated Sun, 4 Jan 2015 19:46:22 -0500
with message-id <20150105004622.GW11561@gambit>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-gnupg-maint] Work-needing packages report for Dec 26, 2014
has caused the Debian Bug report #660685,
regarding RFH: gnupg -- GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
660685: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660685
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I request assistance with maintaining the gnupg package. The package is
team-maintained via alioth (pkg-gnupg group).

Regards, Daniel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk9CrbEACgkQm0bx+wiPa4w28wCgpy6PdGgZhB1mohgM3Dn5epWY
o5QAn2UsFOJKsFyyif7Eha7hTQUuWgGj
=jxCl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor (dkg@fifthhorseman.net) wrote:
> On 12/25/2014 10:11 PM, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * wnpp@debian.org (wnpp@debian.org) wrote:
> >> The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
> >> through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
> >> last week.
> >>
> >> Total number of orphaned packages: 658 (new: 1)
> >> Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 146 (new: 1)
> >> Total number of packages requested help for: 57 (new: 0)
> >>
> >> Please refer to http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for more information.
> >>
> > [snip]
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> For the following packages help is requested:
> > [snip] 
> >>    gnupg (#660685), requested 1039 days ago
> >>      Description: GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement
> >>      Reverse Depends: 0install-core apt aptly arriero bootstrap-base
> >>        cdebootstrap cdebootstrap-static clamav-unofficial-sigs cloud-utils
> >>        debbindiff (58 more omitted)
> >>      Installations reported by Popcon: 171524
> > [snip]
> > 
> > Given the formation of pkg-gnupg-maint and the joining of gnupg to
> > that group, should the RFH be rescinded?
> 
> Yes, i think it can be.  Thanks for keeping tabs on this, Eric.

Closing. Thijs, please reopen if you disagree.

-- 
Eric Dorland <eric@kuroneko.ca>
43CF 1228 F726 FD5B 474C  E962 C256 FBD5 0022 1E93

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: