On 10-Nov-2014, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 10 novembre 2014 12:36 +1100, Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> : > > > That [note about a manual password generation method] sounds like > > something to report upstream, perhaps for inclusion in the > > documentation. I don't think it belongs in the Debian packaging; > > do you? > > It could be fit in the long description. That's orthogonal to whether it *should* be in the long description. By my reading of Policy §3.4.2, I don't see why such a reference to a third-party document would be important enough to clutter the long description of this package. It should, IMO, go into the package's documentation, if at all. If you're saying the package documentation should have that reference, I can agree, but the Debian packaging doesn't need to mention it IMO. -- \ “The internet's completely over.… Anyway, all these computers | `\ and digital gadgets are no good. They just fill your head with | _o__) numbers and that can't be good for you.” —Prince, 2010-07-05 | Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature