[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#573738: marked as done (RFP: rygel-grilo -- Grilo-based provider for Rygel)



Your message dated Sun, 9 Nov 2014 01:41:00 +0100
with message-id <20141109004100.GA10134@fatal.se>
and subject line no longer interested
has caused the Debian Bug report #573738,
regarding RFP: rygel-grilo -- Grilo-based provider for Rygel
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
573738: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573738
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>

* Package name    : rygel-grilo
  Version         : 0.0.0
  Upstream Author : Juan A. Suarez Romero <jasuarez@igalia.com>
* URL             : http://gitorious.com/grilo/rygel-grilo
* License         : LGPL
  Programming Lang: C
  Description     : Grilo-based provider for Rygel

rygel-grilo is a program that implements the "MediaServer specification"
(http://live.gnome.org/Rygel/MediaServerSpec) and exposes content
found by grilo backends over DBus to Rygel (and potential future
implementions of the client part of the MediaServer specification).
This means rygel-grilo makes all the grilo plugins content
(read: youtube, jamendo, flickr, ...) accessible over UPnP/DLNA.

rygel-grilo is still in very early development and I don't have
any plans to package it until it atleast reaches basic maturity.
Additionally grilo itself needs packaging first (see separate ITP).

Regards,
Andreas Henriksson



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Close.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: