[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#753282: marked as done (ITP: node-connect-static -- static file server middleware for connect)

Your message dated Mon, 6 Oct 2014 22:02:33 -0700
with message-id <CACXN+=S0ZQqJZ6XLFTcLfKfNXkHpJgGWLg7UpGipb3d62fjUUg@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #753282,
regarding ITP: node-connect-static -- static file server middleware for connect
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
753282: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753282
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Kelley <superjoe30@gmail.com>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

* Package name    : node-connect-static
  Version         : 1.2.0
  Upstream Author : Andrew Kelley <superjoe30@gmail.com>
* URL             : https://github.com/andrewrk/connect-static
* License         : Expat
  Programming Lang: _javascript_
  Description     : static file server middleware for connect - Node.js module

 When you create the middleware, it will immediately scan the requested
 directory, gzip all the files, and save the cache into memory, where it will
 forever remain. When a request hits the middleware it never touches the file
 system.
 .
 This is not to be confused with the static middleware that used to ship with
 express and connect. That module is node-serve-static.
 .
 Node.js is an event-based server-side _javascript_ engine.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
FTP master decided this module was too small to package.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: