Bug#714454: polyphone: changing back from ITP to RFP
Hi Davy,
Did you submit an RFS? I cannot find one for polyphone.
Have you tried finding a team inside which you could maintain polyphone?
Maintaining packages inside teams is usually a good way to find
sponsors.
Lucas
On 07/08/14 at 20:15 +0200, Davy Triponney wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It did happen!
> I'm the author of the software, and as soon as I wrote the ITP a package
> was ready.
> I released today the version 1.4 of Polyphone and I submitted the package:
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/polyphone
> I take care every time to specify that I need a sponsor.
>
> I don't know what is the next step. Should I advertise to find a sponsor?
>
> Regards,
> Davy
>
>
> 2014-07-28 15:47 GMT+02:00 Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>:
>
> > retitle 714454 RFP: polyphone -- soundfont editor (.sf2 format 2.01 and
> > 2.04)
> > noowner 714454
> > tag 714454 - pending
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging polyphone.
> > Unfortunately,
> > it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs
> > open
> > for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to
> > refrain from packaging the software.
> >
> > This is an automatic email to change the status of polyphone back from ITP
> > (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't
> > seen
> > any activity during the last 12 months.
> >
> > If you are still interested in packaging polyphone, please send a mail to
> > <control@bugs.debian.org> with:
> >
> > retitle 714454 ITP: polyphone -- soundfont editor (.sf2 format 2.01 and
> > 2.04)
> > owner 714454 !
> > thanks
> >
> > It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to
> > time, by mailing <714454@bugs.debian.org>. If you need guidance on how to
> > package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the
> > debian-mentors@lists.debian.org mailing list.
> >
> > Thank you for your interest in Debian,
> > --
> > Lucas, for the QA team <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
> >
Reply to: