On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 12:33:36AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > Right, the package name is not ideal (cf. also #735622). > > Ok, looks like we need to work out something. Does the ruby package > need to name the binary /usr/bin/spork? I think it's not needed. I was just following the documentation[1] of that tool. Since that tool is only useful for Ruby developers, I think I just can rename the binary to /usr/bin/ruby-spork and add a README file explaining why was renamed. 1. https://github.com/sporkrb/spork -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key. "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature