[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#738093: stunnel4 maintenance



On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 05:42:29PM +0100, László Böszörményi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 02:56:40PM +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> >> How does the adoption of stunnel4 goes? More than one and half months
> >> passed. Upstream released version 5.00 since then and 5.01 is on its
> >> way. I've a package ready, but can hold off if you need time.
> > I'm actually almost ready with a 5.00 package myself, with a lot of
> > packaging updates.  It should be done and up for sponsorship in
> > two or three days at most.
>  Cool! May we do it together? Anyway, will sponsor your upload.

OK, so it took a bit more than a couple of days, but I believe that what
is currently in the stunnel collab-maint repo should be good to go:

  git clone git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/stunnel.git

I'd be glad if you could take a look at it and comment on it - even if
you find that you disagree with some of my decisions :)  And of course,
it's fine for me if the package is maintained collaboratively - if you
want to make any changes, add yourself as a maintainer or uploader,
just go ahead.

I've taken care of several of the bugs in the BTS.  Some of the rest I'd
say are invalid, some of the rest I'll ask if they are still
reproducible, and some of them do need more work.  I'll respond to most
of them, but, well, this may sound a bit silly, but I'd like to wait
until the package is actually in Debian and I can respond in some sort
of more "official" capacity as the real maintainer at the time :)

Once again, thanks for your interest in stunnel and for your assistance!

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev	roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org p.penchev@storpool.com
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115  C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
This sentence contradicts itself - or rather - well, no, actually it doesn't!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: