Hey, Sorry for the delayed response. anarcat <anarcat@debian.org> writes: > It seems like upstream fixed a bunch of those issues already, is that > right? At least the mediagoblin/tests/test_submission/ seems fine to me. > The extlib directory seems more tricky, but my guess is that you could > just not ship what's in another debian package in the gmg binary > package, and for the rest ship it until someone packages the goods. Upstream did fix the issues. I've cherry-picked the changes and applied them to a dfsg-free version of 0.6.1. > What are exactly the issues needing to be solved now? Right now I'm waiting on a review. > How are you communicating with upstream, are there bug reports? It would > be helpful if you would cc this bug report in those communications to > get an idea of the progress being made. :) There are bug reports. I'll make sure to CC this bug in the future. The two tickets for the issues that I've referenced above are: https://issues.mediagoblin.org/ticket/847 https://issues.mediagoblin.org/ticket/848 Regards, Simon
Attachment:
pgpvgBPH3CVto.pgp
Description: PGP signature