[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#637771: marked as done (RFP: wxmupen64plus -- Mupen64Plus 2.0 GUI frontend written using wxWidgets)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:54:18 +1300
with message-id <20140312225418.GA1954@gemse>
and subject line Re: Bug#637771: RFP: wxmupen64plus -- Mupen64Plus 2.0 GUI frontend written using wxWidgets
has caused the Debian Bug report #637771,
regarding RFP: wxmupen64plus -- Mupen64Plus 2.0 GUI frontend written using wxWidgets
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
637771: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637771
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : wxmupen64plus
  Version         : 0.1
  Upstream Author : Marianne Gagnon <auria.mg@gmail.com>
* URL             : https://bitbucket.org/auria/wxmupen64plus/wiki/Home
* License         : GPL2+... see http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/wxmupen64plus.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;hb=HEAD
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description     : Mupen64Plus 2.0 GUI frontend written using wxWidgets

I wanted to use mupen64plus, but the version in sid doesn't have a gui. I was
informed that wxmupen64plus is currently the only good one (the rest seem to
be more hacks or only launcher applications).

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 04:53:48PM +0000, Franz Schrober wrote:
> The upstream project is already dead. Here a quote from the maintainer
> 
> {Saturday, October 26, 2013} [21:14:27] <Auria> I don't really have
> time/interest anymore to properly develop wxMupen64Plus,
> unfortunately.

In the light of this, it doesn't seem sensible to keep this RFP open.
Packaging something which is already dead upstream is rarely a good
idea.

If someone takes over upstream development, we can just reopen this
bug.

Cheers,
    Olly

--- End Message ---
Reply to: