Bug#686447: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] any news/reply regarding ZFS in NEW?

[Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez <clopez@igalia.com>]

On 02/03/14 06:56, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2014, at 4:52 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> 
>> > Hostile binary takeover is not allowed - that is two separate source
>> > packages should not build the same binary package names, even if on
>> > different architectures.
> Ok, sounds reasonable when you say it like that. I'd still appreciate a link to the policy for that.


One possible example of theoretical breakage is to run the command
"apt-get source libzfs1", right now it downloads the kfreebsd/zfsutils
sources, but I don't know what will happen when zfs-linux is allowed
into the archives.

Is apt intelligent enough to pick the source corresponding to the binary
package of the host arch?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature