Peter, Peter De Wachter wrote: > Ok, I've taken a look, and I think we don't need to bother with clens at > all. As far as I can tell it only duplicates stuff that's already in > libbsd. I've attached a trivial patch to use that library and it seems > to work fine. Can you check if that's okay with upstream? Han replied (without CC'ing you) with "I'll look into that sometime". So I suggest we proceed with your patch and not bother with clens.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature