[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#734418: ITP: gap-io -- low level C library IO bindings for GAP



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Again,

I thought I had CC to Debian Science.

On 07/01/14 10:50, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> I also guess you want to maintain this package in Debian Science team.
> I'm a bit unsure whether it should be mentioned in the mathematics task
> explicitly.

A proper task would be rather the sub-task GAP packages;
as mention in a previous email, there is a lot of them.

BW,
Jerome


> 
> Kind regards
> 
>       Andreas.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:55:10AM +0100, Jerome Benoit wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: Jerome Benoit <calculus@rezozer.net>
>>
>> * Package name    : gap-io
>>   Version         : 4.2
>>   Upstream Author : Max Neunhoeffer <neunhoef@mcs.st-and.ac.uk>
>> * URL             : http://www-circa.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~neunhoef/Computer/Software/Gap/io.html
>> * License         : GPL
>>   Programming Lang: C, GAP
>>   Description     : low level C library IO bindings for GAP
>>
>> This GAP package brings to GAP a link to the standard UNIX I/O
>> functionalities available through the C-library.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>> Archive: [🔎] 20140107015510.16235.7839.reportbug@nen.dnsalias.org">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20140107015510.16235.7839.reportbug@nen.dnsalias.org
>>
>>
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSy9MnAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjRT0IAIK6QVr7MP1ZacU5sTWDs+9t
a80IOHpzotV3sQYO6mCtjopjP2jjcjlNlb0IvTOJtN60vgIb2IWz27w4lMX3KgBW
yqn/EobDlvlLt3B6R6JvTVi/z7+u12ENrqSNPhXAipHYrGcHtJgQ8l7c6A7F5DjQ
wfE6N0rB5f3lYNW3Qd9CUsgC7Grh5SbQ0qYTzgOjMUtstcYlo96G+QlxsVXzUnns
HOpmS6AEX2A1/H64OWxOBsjOHJVp/VTbZ8U0wNoA/SHZHdEOh/+k0CDyDfigN6bo
bVnJe7RpeAcCMIaY/DGzda58toUcjyEL7wCVjc0FNC8GqWYC0/0vdzOFlG41cic=
=LaRj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: