Bug#727085: Now we don't depend on the weird libevent patch
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org> wrote:
> On 01/04/14 19:54, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> Anyway, folly is packaged and uploaded. HHVM is one small step
>> closer to be part of Debian.
>
> Does folly have a stable ABI? I remember raising this with Paul some time
> ago and us deciding that embedding folly into the HHVM source would be the
> way to go, as there is really no stable interface between them.
I can't answer this question. Still, I expect that HHVM will follow
ABI changes very fast. Paul?
Anyway, I think having a separate package and let users get knowledge
of that doesn't mean HHVM can't use an embedded copy if it needs to.
But it should be a separate package whenever it's possible.
> Also, you're really supposed to file separate ITPs for separate packages
> (and file them *before* you make an upload).
??? Please see its ITP[1]. I just noted the upload here. It's closed
by the changelog in the folly package if that will be accepted into
the archive.
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/734188
Reply to: