[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#724231: marked as done (O: python-drizzle -- python binding to libdrizzle)

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jan 2014 17:27:47 +0000
with message-id <E1VyPa7-0002Nu-Hf@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#733485: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #724231,
regarding O: python-drizzle -- python binding to libdrizzle
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
724231: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724231
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

After being in contact with Monty Taylor he aggreed that python-drizzle
should be orphaned.

On 09/20/2013 02:16 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Dear Monty Taylor, 
> 
> How are you? I hope that you are fine.

All is quite well, thanks!

> I was wondering about your packages python-drizzle and plywood, which
> has a few important bugs pending and only being NMUed the last two
> years. Also your other packages did not receive an upload the past
> years.
> 
> Please let me know if you are still active, because your packages are
> missing you. Please tell me a little bit about your plans regarding your
> packages, what you are going to do and when you think you are going to
> do so.

I have, in fact, lost interest in these packages. I was packaging them
because I was also upstream for them - and then I stopped working on
them as an upstream, so I stopped working on them as a packager too.

> If you aren't interested in your packages anymore, just tell us as well
> and we'll try to find new maintainers. In case your packages are
> co-maintained, you may have lost interest in them so you (or we) can ask
> not to be mentioned in maintainer fields. 

Yes please - I think a new maintainer would be great. That said - both
are essentially abandoned upstream, so it might be worthwhile looking to
see if it makes sense for them to remain in debian at all.

> Thank you for all your contributions and regards, 

Thank you!

Monty

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1.0-3.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package python-drizzle has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/733485

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ansgar Burchardt (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: