On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:02:23PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: > 2013/11/15 Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org>: > > While develoment on xemacs is very slow these days I find it much more > > visually pleasing than GNU emacs. > I know it is mostly personal preference, but what parts of xemacs are notably > more pleasing visually? > I have just switched to a back-ported Emacs 24.3.1 and noticed that the GTK+3 > scrollbars became pretty nice and had the thought that 'Hey, it looks > quite OK now!'. > Maybe if you point out some visual issues which are solved in XEmacs, GNU Emacs > developers would pick those up. The colour scheme and font selection are particularly appealing to me and with emacs23 I find that the window looks like it is missing a border at the right hand side (partly due to the unusual decision to place the scroll bar on the left) which is odd. Some of this is just familiarity, some of it could be fixed with configuration.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature