[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#701018: #701018 ITP: rtl-sdr -- Software defined radio receiver for Realtek RTL2832U dongles



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>>>> "Uwe" == Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de> writes:
Uwe> doesn't look like I'll have time to take care of rtl-sdr anytime soon,
Uwe> please consider my ITP retracted. If anyone of you guys wants to take
Uwe> over the package please go ahead. Sorry for the trouble.

That is quite allright. It's been a wild ride following rtl-sdr
activity, but things seem to have settled into a form worth capturing
as Debian packages. That said, if you have any ideas on getting
upstream to move forward with sane version numbering and use of
library sonames and soversion, keep contributing!

Motivated by Jonathan Corgan's effort to come up with a consistant
set of GNU Radio community packages for his gr-live DVD project, I
have taken his set of revisions to upload new Debian packages.

So I have have been working toward getting gqrx-sdr into Debian.
It depends upon gr-osmosdr, and so I have uploaded all the
packages needed by gr-osmosdr into NEW already. I've got my
gqrx-sdr and gr-osmosdr packages in good shape, and they will
soon follow modulo any bugs turned up by the autobuilders for
various odd architectures.

Once this set of packages are accepted into Debian, I want to
put all the package development into git on Alioth under
collab-maint. Then I can start building a software defined
radio maintenance team. You are on my list - let me know what you
would like to see that would make it easier for you to contribute.
I'm thinking some git-buildpackage workflow - but I still haven't
learned much about that yet myself.

Thanks for your interest,
- -Maitland
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.9 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAlJet2EACgkQkwbJvNrxBUwfhwCeLe/jeUBKlLWqf1qdYSPC6P71
g0cAoJbkF8iJ5UASYE3/CYs8O8HytZK8
=P+t1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: