Bug#721521: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#721521: ITP: fonts-urw-base35 -- Set of the 35 PostScript Language Level 2 Base Fonts
Hi Norbert et al.,
Am Mittwoch, den 04.09.2013, 10:00 +0900 schrieb Norbert Preining:
> For now we can upload. As long as the TeX Live package do not
> ship symlinks to the new fonts nothing happens.
>
> On the usptream (TeX Live) (I am also maintainer there) I will see if
> we can prepare an updated package for CTAN with the exact fonts,
> which would solve the problem automatically.
It would be great if you could take care upstream that texlive is made
compatible with the new urw-base35 fonts release.
> Bottom line: Is there anything else before I should sponsor this package?
I'd say "no", but I am sure that a huge glaring bug will occur the
second after the package is uploaded. :)
> One more thing - I *agree* (for now at least) that *chanigng
> the /FontName
> is *not* a good idea.
By this you mean that changing the /FontName fields *back* to the values
of the old gsfonts package is a bad idea? Alright, then we just keep the
font files untouched.
Thank you for sposoring already!
- Fabian
Reply to: