Bug#721521: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#721521: ITP: fonts-urw-base35 -- Set of the 35 PostScript Language Level 2 Base Fonts
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> > Why? Sounds like a _very_ bad idea to me (no matter if others did
> > similar bad stuff in the past).
>
> Because the font names may be hard coded somewhere (the internal
> FontName and FontFamily fields, I am not talking about the file names).
One more thing - I *agree* (for now at least) that *chanigng the /FontName
is *not* a good idea.
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: