[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: FPM will not introduced in the archive after all



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 704685 RFP: ruby-clamp -- a minimal framework for command-line utilities
Bug #704685 [wnpp] ITP: ruby-clamp -- a minimal framework for command-line utilitie
Changed Bug title to 'RFP: ruby-clamp -- a minimal framework for command-line utilities' from 'ITP: ruby-clamp -- a minimal framework for command-line utilitie'
> noowner 704685
Bug #704685 [wnpp] RFP: ruby-clamp -- a minimal framework for command-line utilities
Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org>.
> retitle 704684 RFP: ruby-cabin -- Experiments in structured and contextual logging
Bug #704684 [wnpp] ITP: ruby-cabin -- Experiments in structured and contextual logging
Changed Bug title to 'RFP: ruby-cabin -- Experiments in structured and contextual logging' from 'ITP: ruby-cabin -- Experiments in structured and contextual logging'
> noowner 704684
Bug #704684 [wnpp] RFP: ruby-cabin -- Experiments in structured and contextual logging
Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org>.
> # Closing as upstream doesn't want us to include FPM in the archive
> # See: https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm/issues/409#issuecomment-19205481
> close 688896
Bug #688896 [wnpp] ITP: fpm -- Effing Package Management
Marked Bug as done
> #Closing as it's probably useless in the archive if FPM is not introduced
> close 704686
Bug #704686 [wnpp] ITP: ruby-arr-pm -- RPM reader and writer Ruby library
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
688896: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688896
704684: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704684
704685: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704685
704686: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704686
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: